hooglshirt.blogg.se - Splunk competitors

The mobile application monitoring has been pretty difficult to set up and also quite expensive. This is the main issue in the APM products and also in New Relic. They have been able to fix the issue, but it took quite a long time. It is not able to record information with the application server. "The solution could improve by having more network monitoring features, such as for all the infrastructure." "How granular I could go down at looking at certain data, especially related to the operations, is limited." "It would be nice if there were pre-made dashboards." "I haven't come across any features that are lacking." "There has been some problem with the agent, and it is just not working well.

With Azure Monitor, you are able to monitor all of your cloud resources across multiple subscriptions in one dashboard and create solution-specific alerts that can trigger an email to the team responsible for that specific solution." It is fairly good at that." "The feature that I found most valuable in Azure Monitor is its monitoring abilities. It's just collecting data and monitoring the environment and the infrastructure. It's a stable and low-priced solution." "Azure Monitor is really just a source for Dynatrace. It's easy to implement and simple to use." "Provides an overview and high-level information." "Data exporting is easy, and this tool works seamlessly with other solutions. "You can scale the product." "Azure Monitor is useful because of the useful application insights and telemetry, such as metrics and logs." "The most valuable features of Azure Monitor are the login analytics workspace and we can write any kind of custom queries in order to receive the data that is inserted into the login analytics workspace, diagnostic settings, et cetera." "The solution works well overall.

In addition, Splunk received positive feedback in the ROI category. It is easier to deploy, more user-friendly, and has better support than Azure Monitor. Most Splunk users report being satisfied with the level of support they receive.Ĭomparison Results: Splunk is clear the winner in this comparison.

Service and Support: Azure Monitor users had mixed reviews for the level of support they receive.

In contrast, Splunk users report an extensive ROI.

ROI: Azure Monitor users say they do not see a ROI.

Pricing: Reviewers of both solutions feel that their prices are high.

Splunk users are happy with its performance, flexibility, and ease of use, but find it difficult to configure. Azure Monitor reviewers report that it is good at data collection and monitoring but needs better reporting features.

Features: Users of both products are happy with their stability and scalability.

While many Splunk users say the initial setup is straightforward, several users disagree and say it is complex.

Ease of Deployment: Half of Azure Monitor’s reviewers say that the initial setup is straightforward and half say it is complex.

After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below. We performed a comparison between Azure Monitor and Splunk based on our users’ reviews in five categories.